Tuesday, March 2, 2010

My Oscar Love-Hate Story--A Personal Anecdote

All of you friends who visit my journal, and movie fans everywhere, know that the Academy Awards will be handed out on Sunday March 7.  While I don't think there will be too many surprises, even with the new balloting in the expanded Best Picture category, there's always a chance at a shocking upset, an unforgettable moment.


Before the week is over, I'll write here about my predictions, as well as how I would vote if I had a ballot.  Also, I will recall some of my biggest upsets or surprises, good or bad, and ask readers to remember their own.


Tonight...the Oscar moment that shocked me like no other, made me think I would never follow Oscars again, and forced me to confront how I defined myself.


This is a personal remembrance, confessional, what have you.  I appreciate those of you who come along with me on this journey of personal discovery....


_     _      _      _     _

Growing up, I lived for movies.  I used Oscars as a way to understand what the industry thought was good filmmaking, justify my own opinions, gain access to forbidden adult-themed films, and impress friends with my knowledge of Oscar facts.  As I began making my own films, I copied techniques from sequences I loved from Oscar-winning movies. 


When I stood alone in my enthusiasm for a difficult film, Oscar often vindicated me with a win, or at least a handful of nominations.


As I followed Oscar movies and contests over the years, I often championed a film that was not a front-runner.  Most of the time I truly liked another film better, and had to resign myself to seeing another picture take the big prize.  By Oscar night, the probable winners were predicted and discussed repeatedly, and all of the other indicators (Guild Awards, Golden Globes, critics picks, and betting lines) usually had historical accuracy in pointing to the victorious film.


Sometimes a favorite, something that I closely identifiied with and held dear, actually won.  Having one of my favorites held up as an example of excellence for world acclaim and recognition, felt,by extension, like a personal reward, and I was proud in those thrilling moments: Bob Fosse snatching Best Director for "Cabaret", "Annie Hall" improbably taking Best Picture, "I'm Easy" from "Nashville" winning for Best Song, "Babe" for Special Effects; "Silence of the Lambs" sweeping the Top Five.  These worked on me like jackpots to a gambler. They kept me coming back every year.


Then, in 2005, I saw a movie that came together for me like no other: impeccably directed, beautifully adapted from a powerful short story, inhabited by its performers rather than acted by them, photographed gorgeously, with a subtle, delicate and haunting score.  It was a movie that portrayed a part of the country at a time in our history that hardly appeared in American movies, with characters I had never seen on screen before.  It told a story about people, a simple story with a still-unusual twist. The love between these men was real.   

I understood every nuance, every half-formed thought, every tentative gesture of affection.  It unfolded without political comment, romantically, with humor and honesty, to an inevitable and heartbreaking conclusion, with no histrionics.  It filled the screen like art in a gallery, but lived and breathed like the rugged sheepherders who fell in love one summer on "Brokeback Mountain". 


Ang Lee accomplished a subtle choreography of hidden glances and furtive affection, culminating in a startlingly intense episode of passion. "Brokeback Mountain" took viewers on a tour of an emotional landscape, one of hopeful companionship and desperate loneliness, at turns lush and austere. None of the characters was perfect. Each had recognizable noble features and tragic flaws. No one was a villain.  All were victims of forces none could articulate.  It felt true; the actors knew these people; and so did I, on many levels.  Like others who embraced this film, we finally saw ourselves, and our emotional truths, portrayed on screen by characters we knew had existed, and still do.


The idyllic opening sequence on the Mountain represented the big, open longing and freedom of Ennis and Jack, who found love for each other, only to see their worlds get smaller as they met the expectations of their limited environments, worlds that would not allow a loving partnership between two men.  They tried over the years with increasing desperation to go back to that magical time with each other.  Toward the film's conclusion, a scene depicting Ennis' visit to Jack's parents' home is as hypnotic and artistic a sequence as has been achieved by any dramatic film.  The image of the pathetic remnants of their great friendship and love, a postcard and two shirts, still haunts me.

It was everything I looked for in a film...to me, it was a perfect movie.





Had "Brokeback Mountain" passed under the awards radar, and quietly appeared and disappeared, I would have loved it just as much, but would never have placed so much of my own identity into its every victory on the awards circuit.


But it began winning awards (see a complete list here). And it started to clean up, winning everything from the Venice Film Festival, New York Film Critics, Golden Globes, American Film Institute, Broadcast Film Critics, BAFTA, Independent Spirit, and many others.  It cleaned up at the Writers, Directors, and Producers Guilds.  Ang Lee was the director of the moment. The film became a cultural phenomenon; but because of its nature as a "gay love story", the acclaim often became ugly. 


In spite of it winning all of the precursors that normally guaranteed a victory as Oscar's Best Picture, a campaign seemed to be underfoot to unseat the film.  Many conservative celebrities (and Oscar voters) were on record as claiming they refused to see it. 


Soon it was whispered, and then discussed, and finally built to a crescendo, that a small film called "Crash",  that had little Award cachet, was the most likely competition to Brokeback, which many considered the natural front-runner.


Finally...a movie that I loved....a movie that I identified with, was clearly the front-runner for the Oscars.  It almost couldn't miss......I would finally be the guest of honor at my own party...


And on March 5, 2006, this happened:



All I could do was moan the word "no" over and over again.  Clearly, this was a campaign of organized homophobia.  A segment of the Academy must have agreed to use "Crash", a self-important film about the pervasiveness of racism, as a weapon to ensure that no movie which portrayed a gay relationship went in the Oscar record books as Hollywood's best.


I felt like I had been unceremoniously shown the door.  I actually felt depressed for days; I was sure that the sad, sad, story that was "Brokeback Mountain" would find its sweet conclusion with Oscar glory, and that all of my life-study of film, all of my close scrutiny of Oscar lore and history, would finally pay off in a moment of sweet personal triumph.


I swore I would never watch Oscars again (even the following year when Ellen Degeneres was tapped as the Host of the telecast, a blatant ploy to bring back disgruntled gay fans, I thought.)  And for a year or two, I honestly believed that I was through with Oscars, and movies.  I needed to put that part of me to rest. I had lost my perspective.

Needing support, I started to read the internet, and found a wonderful blog by writer Dave Cullen, devoted to the Brokeback experience, called The Ultimate Brokeback Mountain Forum.  I soon discovered that there were hundreds of others who felt as I did.  It was also the first time I ever committed my own words on a blog.

I still hate what happened in 2006 with "Brokeback Mountain".  But the lure of the Academy Awards, as an enduring (if now less sacrosanct) historic record of American Popular Culture, has me in its grip once again.

The best thing this passionate Italian learned from the experience, as I sought to reinvent myself, was to trust my own view, and love a film (or not) as though awards were never given.  And to laugh, have fun, and not have to point to an award as justification of my own opinion, but to write my own argument, and stand by it, and re-evaluate it in time.

See you on March 7th!

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Illinois Celebrates Animal Volunteers--A Saturday Journal

Movies, current events, Olympics, and other topics for this journal are taking a back seat to animals....and you know what?  I don't mind that they have come out in front one more time!  What better way to slow down and be genuinely yourself, to reflect on the direction of one's life, than in the company of the creatures in our midst.....



For once, Illinois lawmakers have a nice bit of news, and I feel proud to be a small part of it.  It is not a loud proclamation, and I might have missed it had I not received this message from The Buddy Foundation:

"Saturday, February 27, 2010 will be proclaimed Pet Rescue Day in Illinois by Governor Pat Quinn at a ceremony at 11:30am in the Rescue section at the International Kennel Club of Chicago Show at McCormick Place in Chicago, IL. Governor Quinn is issuing this proclamation to recognize, and honor, the many, many people here in the state of Illinois that have so selflessly taken it upon themselves to rescue, foster, rehabilitate and find permanent homes for our states homeless companion animals."
I'm proud to share this proclamation with my friends from outside of Illinois....even fellow residents who might otherwise have been unaware, like me.  I will be unable to attend the ceremony, as I am looking after my "regular" charge, Shayna the Border Collie.  Apparently, there are a number of rescue organizations represented at the Dog Show this weekend, along with Dog Clubs and hundreds of specific breeders.

Of course, this being Illinois, even a good-hearted and uplifting proclamation to recognize animal-lovers and caregivers is shadowed by politics and controversy.  Governor Quinn's Republican rival Bill Brady is pushing to introduce a law that will allow any particular facility to euthanize companion animals in groups.  The current lawlets only one animal to be euthanized in a facility at a time.  The story has it that Brady's Senate district operates an animal gas chamber, in which it can take up to 30 minutes for an animal to die.  Quinn strategically publicized this issue, and plans to attend the show himself today.

All the more reason to champion those that seek to care for homeless animals.  We have a long way to go to create a world where no healthy animal need lose its life for want of a loving home.

Please enjoy the following quotes.  If you are able, consider saving an animal.  To those of you who were able, and did, my sincere friendship, and gratitude:


"I think how we treat our animals reflects how we treat each other ... And it's very important that we have a president who is mindful of the cruelty that is perpetrated on animals ..."~Barack Obama President Elect USA


"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." ~Will Rogers


"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." ~Immanuel Kant


"Animals cannot speak, but can you and I not speak for them and represent them? Let us all feel their silent cry of agony and let us all help that cry to be heard in the world." ~Rukmini Devi Arundale



"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something I can do." ~Edward Everet Hale~


"I looked at all the caged animals in the shelter...the cast-offs of human society. I saw in their eyes love and hope, fear and dread, sadness and betrayal. And I was angry. "God," I said, "this is terrible! Why don't you do something?" God was silent for a moment and then He spoke softly. I have done something," He replied. "I created you." ~The Animals' Savior Copyright Jim Willis 1999

Thursday, February 25, 2010

A Sled Dog, And A Whale...An Animal Journal for Thursday

Animals figured prominently in today's news, bearing witness to the indisputable beauty and tragedy of nature.



My favorite segment on last evening's Olympic Games (and re-broadcast on this morning's Today Show) was a feature about Isobel, a nine-year-old Siberian Husky-malamute mix.  Isobel was a sled dog who lived to run, and who went blind several years ago.  Her retinas detached sometime during a race, the possible result of a virus.  Isobel's veterinarian told her owners, Gerald Azure and Jenafor Ollander, that she may never again be able to work as a sled dog.  They tried to keep her indoors and make her life comfortable away from the sled, but Isobel, deprived of her passion, became derpressed, and stopped eating and drinking. 

Soon, they allowed Isobel to run again with her pack, placing her in the sled team to compete once more.  Isobel came alive once again in the company of the pack members she loved.  Now, years later, Isobel will retire.  Watch her inspiring story in the following video...



My first dog when I was a small child was Bonnie,  a lovely Collie-Shepherd puppy that I will never foget.  She was so easy to train.  When we let her outside she found her spot, and then ran back inside.  At the word "treat",  she would scamper to the kitchen cabinet and sit up for a biscuit. 

Not yet a year old, her eyes quickly glazed over until they were completely blue.  Bonnie had gone blind.  I thought of Bonnie while I watched Isobel's story.  Many people at the time believed that it was cruel to keep a blind dog, and recommended that Bonnie be put down.  Even though, sightless, she could still find her spot, and still beg next to the cabinet for a treat, we eventually took her in to the vet for her final sleep.....

Since then I have known and cared for blind dogs.  Isobel's story produced in me the same guilt and uncertainty I felt for years after Bonnie entered and then quietly left my life.  At the same time, I was warmed by the beauty of Isobel's triumph, which alleviated my characteristic annual Winter Blues considerably. 

~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~















Dawn Brancheau, an experienced trainer who understood the dangers of her job, was killed by a killer whale at the SeaWorld Shamu Stadium in Orlando, Fla., on Wednesday. (Julie Fletcher/Orlando Sentinel/Associated Press)

The news about the death of a veteran trainer at Sea World while working with a Tillikum, a Killer Whale, unsettled me.  I could not pin down my thoughts, which spun wildly from one assumption to another. I will try my best to organize my thoughts, and feelings, here....

We call them Killer Whales because they are fearsome, maybe to give ourselves a sense of accomplishment or dominance at having tamed a beast, maybe to exploit our fears of---and our thirst for---danger.  Then, when the ultimate danger occurs, we become indignant, or don't understand...

There were many calls to release the whale, or put it to death.  I cannot be sure but I suspect the whale did not act out of viciousness.   It was a horrible mistake.  The whale was behaving according to its nature.  Sea World officials will not turn Tillikum loose because it can no longer survive on its own in the wild; and it will not euthanize the whale because it is part of the community of whales at Sea World.

I agree with the decision of the Sea World staff.  I think of one of the dogs at the Buddy Foundation, Harley, a solid brown pit bull, who, through the carelessness of one of the volunteers, began to fight with another dog.  Another volunteer, trying to untangle the dogs, was bitten, and required 25 stitches.

Many would advocate euthanizing the dog.  But the dog acted according to blind instinct.  Harley and Tillikum alike are sheltered in their respective homes.  We could not turn Harley loose to fend for himself.  He cannot be adopted either, so the shelter is the only home he will have. 

At Sea World, the orca shows will be suspended in order to re-evaluate their safety and practicality. I support this too.  Killer Whales should be studied in safe and controlled environments, and it serves litttle purpose to exploit them by teaching them unnatural tricks for human entertainment.  I would feel the same about making Harley the main attraction in a show featuring dog tricks.....

I feel so sorry for the trainer who lost her life.... And at the same time I cannot see placing any burden of responsibility on the creature who caused the death.

The Oscar Ten--A Wednesday Movie Journal


The first thing I did this summer when I heard that Oscar would nominate ten Best Pictures, was to research why the Academy went from 10 down to 5 nominees back in 1944.  I figured that if I understood the Academy's rationale then, for narrowing the field, then maybe there is some precedent in tradition to explain why the field has been widened.


I went on the AMPAS web site, and looked at various critics' blogs, all to no avail.  That's right, not even the Academy's web site had archival information about the accepted numbers of nominees.

Based on what  knew about the movie business, I speculated that, since one consequence of television was a reduction in the number of films that Hollywood produced, it made sense that with lack of volume came a reduced number of quality pictures per studio.  With less revenue coming from fewer pictures, studios could promote fewer movies for Oscar consideration. 

BULETIN: Today, I got a news feed from a blogger who addressed this topic.  Katherine Lee of TuscaloosaNews.com made these observations:

Ten nominees for Best Picture, really, Academy? Are you seriously saying the caliber of all these movies was so stellar this year you couldn’t narrow it down to five? Why not call it what it is: A gimmick to get people to buy more tickets to see more movies. Because otherwise, the only reason I can come up with is sheer laziness.
The last time 10 films were nominated for Best Picture was 1944, the year of “Song of Bernadette,” the front-runner, and “Casablanca,” the dark horse that ended up winning. The number of films was reduced to five the following year because the Oscars were broadcast live on TV for the first time and was running into the early hours of the morning.

It comes as no surprise that TV may have been instrumental in the rule change in1944 as it is in 2010.  To me, it is an interesting commentary on the evolution of the Oscars and the Academy's attempt to reinvent itself.

I agree with Lee's assertion that the additional nominees will drive movie fans to see five additional films in order to fully participate in the festivities, enter the conversation, and, even, wager intelligently in the office pools. 

So with the Oscar telecast promoting even more movies, the industry box-office bottom line should improve.

Ironically, the wider field of contenders has as much to do with the Annual Broadcast as it does with the movie awards.  The most frequent rationale I have heard for expanding the field this year goes something like this:  "Last year, 'The Dark Knight' was not nominated for Best Picture, but would have been if there were additional slots in the category.  By expanding the list of nominees for Best Picture, it is likely that more popular or genre films will be cited, thus the Television Event will see higher ratings (because the ratings for The Show increase with the popularity of the nominated films.)"  If viewers tune out, then the Oscars lose their relevance.....  And so, it's a matter of survival for AMPAS. 

Therefore it appears that the Academy has as much at stake in the ratings for the Oscar Show as it does in recognizing great achievements in filmmaking. 

My question is this:  How could the Academy be sure its theory would work in practice?  Unless there was some unspoken appeal to voters, in their complicated nomination ballots, to include some "populist" titles among the ten (meaning, films that no one would have ever considered significantly Best-Picture-worthy.) 

How else to account for titles like "District 9" and "The Blind Side" in the running?  Or even "Up", an astonishing film, perhaps my favorite of the ten, so likely to win in the Animated Film category that its mention among Best Picture contenders is almost a wasted nomination?

In any other year, if there were still just five Best Picture contenders, this year's nominees might have exactly matched the Best Director nominees: "Avatar", "Hurt Locker", "Inglourious Basterds". "Precious", and "Up In The Air".  So how was the Academy so sure that the remaining five slots would not go to critically praised but less popular pictures like "A Single Man"? "Broken Embraces"? "The White Ribbon"? "500 Days of Summer"?  "Capitalism: A Love Story"? 

(Although Foreign Language films still have an antiquated category of their own, it has not been unusual for oscar to recognize foreign films as Best Picture nominees:  "Grand Illusion", "Z", "The Emigrants", "Cries and Whispers", "Il Postino", "Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon", "Life is Beautiful", even two hours worth of "The Godfather, Part II".)

But, that's Hollywood, the world capital of illusion, and spinner of dreams....   In an upcoming post I'll handicap this category, and a few others.  HINT: A lot of artificial suspense has been created in order to maintain interest in the Show, and ensure high ratings.  I think the winners will be the same front-runners we expected since the Golden Globes in January....I hope my readers will weigh in and prove this theory wrong.....

The boy in me, the one who fell in love with Oscar so long ago, is giddy for some upsets...and I have my favorites....

Monday, February 22, 2010

A Shelter Happy Ending--So Why Am I So Sad?--Monday Journal

Those who have followed me here for the last month have learned of my new volunteer effort at The Buddy Foundation, a dog and cat adoption shelter, in Arlington Heights, Illinois.


I work a regular shift on Tuesdays, feeding and walking the shelter dogs.


I love 'em all, but developed a special bond with Cassie, a Beagle (mixed, I think, with a drop of Bloodhound). Cassie was sheltered in the very last pen, and usually curled herself on the round bed provided. She was gentle as I placed food and water in her cage, and allowed me to pet her long ears while she placed her paws on my forearms.


Docile as she was, she was a bullet on a leash, dashing and dragging me left and right, quickly through the snow, sniffing all she could take in; her pent up energy propelled her and forced me to laughingly run along and hang on for dear life.


I was ready to take her home myself, but circumstances were not right just yet.  I was ready to believe that Maggie, my sweet departed basset hound, looked at me through Cassie's eyes, and approved of my choice of Cassie as my favorite dog in the shelter.


Cassie was just adopted.  I am happy she has found a home...Happy someone will love her....  Happy she will have a yard to roam, a world of scents to explore, a real bed, a real home.  And, sentimental as I am, I can't seem to keep my eyes dry.  I will miss that little girl with my whole heart.