Showing posts with label Movie: "Up". Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie: "Up". Show all posts

Sunday, March 28, 2010

"Up" Is A Classic--A Personal Review


From a capsule review found here on March 23:

"Up"... A Masterpiece, in my opinion......I am going to review this artful, wonderful and, yes, buoyant piece of work. Having now seen it twice, I can hardly find words to express my appreciation for its artistry, originality, and generous and loving observaion of people on the fringe...and its spot-on characterizations of dogs. This is what animated films are all about...."Up" could not exist in any other way but as an animated film, and it packs more genuine emotion, excitement, and laughs of recognition than most any other film this year. The Oscar-winning score is a carnival, a Chaplin movie,... a Fellini circus, a banquet, a dying flower....a perfect marriage of sound to film.
Actually, this is as succinct and complete a recap as I could hope to replicate here.  But there is so much to appreciate about this terrific work that I must make mention of and give a deeper voice to my reactions.


I arrived late to "Up", due to timing, and did not see it on the big screen, to my chagrin.  My two viewings were on a widescreen high definition TV, and although I prefer my initial viewings to be theatrical ones, there was something comforting about enjoying "Up" at home.  It called to mind similar pleasures I enjoyed as a child, eagerly anticipating favorite televised movies that were so inventive, colorful, exciting and moving, that they immediately ceased to be viewed as films but as some kind of life experience, more personal, more enduing.

The characters and settings, and the very recognizable and honest sentiment created by the world of "Up", are as familiar to me now as Oz.  In fact, I may even prefer this world, for its humor, its gentility, and its fantasy tempered by real, human concerns. 


In fact, there are a few subtle similarities to "Wizard of Oz".  The balloon-buoyed storm-tossed house recalls the thrill of Dorothy's tornado. The broken voice translator on the most vicious of the dog pack makes him sound, incidentally, and hilariously, like a munchkin.  And the the elderly Carl and his motley trio-- Russel the lonely and eager scout, Dug the lovably dumb and energetic dog, and "Kevin", the large jungle bird wanting to return to her babies--are even more antic, hilarious and adventuresome than those characters encountered on the Yellow Brick Road. 


Except for the laughs and tears, most of the similarities end there.


"Up" is successful on so many levels: an adventure story, a technical marvel, a comic fantasy, a bittersweet love story, an affectionate study of dogs, kids, and the elderly.  With every detail in its design, every perfectly crafted sequence, every cleverly-written exchange of dialog, and richly scored montage, "Up" is clearly a labor of love by talented artists and craftsmen who are first of all human beings, who have observed life around them and infused this picture with the best of those observations. 


We leave this film feeling energized, inspired, creative, and in touch with a spectrum of feelings often missing from more "sophisticated" movie fare.  There is none of the rouguish innuendo so often tacked on to "family" pictures as a wink to the adults in the audience.  There is adult material here to be sure, but delivered in direct, gut-level situations that don't disturb kids, but that will hit mature audiences in unexpected ways. 


For a surprisingly substantial film, it is breezy and fun. The inventive screenplay is packed with character detail and action, yet achieves its effects economically.    Just watch how, in one shot during an early wedding scene, we learn everything we need to know about the families (and early life) of our protagonist, Carl, and Elly, his bride.  Later, in a few brilliantly efficient lines of dialog, Russel's home life is revealed, as well as Carl's reaction to it.  And in the most famous sequence of all, Carl's and Elly's married life together, in all its sweetness and loss, is presented without dialog in what must be the best cinematic chronicle of a marriage since  the breakfast scene in "Citizen Kane".


We first meet our elderly protagonist, Carl, as a shy young balloon fancier who dreams of exotic adventures.  He meets, and later marries, his tomboy neighbor Elly, who makes Carl promise that they will have adventures of their own some day.  As life moves them in unexpected directions, Carl, alone, becomes a bitter old man who must vacate his home to developers.  Soon, in the most fanciful bit of imagination, he hatches a plan to lift the house off its foundation using thousands of balloons, in his attempt to carry it off to a spot near a mythical South American waterfall they dreamed of as kids.


Both times I viewed "Up", I was determined to pay minute attention to the detail of the effects, the decor of the house, the look of the jungle, the way movement and depth were achieved;  but both times I was too captivated by the adventure.  Later, as a pack of comical dogs pick up the scent of "prunes and denture cream",  I was shocked to discover that Carl had stopped seeming like an old man to me.  He was now a grandfatherly protector, an adventurer, and a lover of dogs and birds. 


Inadvertently, and then with a lovely blessing from his Elly, Carl had reinvented himself. 

(In a very personal way, it was like having my own grandfather, Sam, comically, teasingly, humanly alive.)



Finally I must make mention of how accurately all the artists responsible for this wonderful piece of popular art captured the movements, expressions, and goofy exuberance of dogs.  The character of Dug was a perfect rendering of the facial expressions, the hanging head and look of worry when scolded, the immediate joyful forgetting and forgiveness, even the way his body moved when he breathed.  Only true dog-lovers could have achieved this spirit, and by creating a device by which the dogs could actually"speak" without needing to lip-synch the words, we even get a remarkable and warmly funny look into how these creatures' brains must work, the easy distractions ("Squirrel!"), the obsession with play, and the constant and eager expression of affection.  My favorite line of all:  "I was hiding under your porch because I love you."


Brilliant. Joyful.  Sentimental.  Perfect.  A movie I will enjoy repeatedly, and share with friends, for a long time to come.

Friday, March 26, 2010

"Up" Next!!


First: See the entry below for a new way the Post Office is helping feed Shelter Animals

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Some (Not So) Final Thoughts on This Years' Academy Award Winners

I have been catching up with my friends here in the blogosphere, and have observed with amusement the many opinions offered on the outcome of this year's Academy Awards. It would seem as though I have given short shrift to my own viewpoint, what with the Arizona travel and the whirlwind of activity that swept me up upon my return from the land of deserts and cactus.  So I would now like to contribute to the conversation with a few semi-final words on the winners and contenders.  There are no final words....

"Inglourious Basterds."  I was frankly surprised by the film's strong showing in the nominations. It was well-written at times but lumpy and oddly paced; ultimately frivolous, weighted only by some outrageous brutality amid the casual offhandedness and strained atmosphere of slapstick. Christof Waltz was strong and creepy and original; honestly though, I believe that if I saw this before any talk of awards, I would not have immediately said, "wow, this is Oscar material".  I think Waltz, interesting as he is, truly had the benefit of a somewhat forgettable field.

"Precious".  Being confronted by ugliness and despair makes most of us uncomfortable.  One  triumph of art is to distil an essence of humanity from something ferocious and ugly, and discovering some beauty in that which we may callously write off.  "Precious" shows us a hideous existence, yes, but does so in a singular way as to not cast a whole demographic in this light. We often refuse to admit that life in all of this sorrow can really exist; we would rather not know. "Precious" not only presents this world, but moves us within it, jars our senses with it, and provides a catharsis that brings us in touch with the potential for good in our own humanity.  Mo'Nique left me with no doubt that here was a portrayal of the ages, deserving of any amount of recognition.  And Gaby Sidibe did what few young actors have done recently: she performed with raw honesty, convinced me that this character was alive, and reduced me to tears; I could not help react to her despair, nor to her teacher's advice to keep writing to overcome her sadness.     Its Screenplay victory was among my biggest cheers of the evening.

"Up"... A Masterpiece, in my opinion.  Tomorrow I am going to review this artful, wonderful and, yes, buoyant piece of work. Having now seen it twice, I can hardly find words to express my appreciation for its artistry, originality, and generous and loving observaion of people on the fringe...and its spot-on characterizations of dogs.  This is what animated films are all about...."Up" could not exist in any other way but as an animated film, and it packs more genuine emotion, excitement, and laughs of recognition than most any other film this year.  The Oscar-winning score is a carnival, a Chaplin movie (thanks Mark), a Fellini circus, a banquet, a dying flower....a perfect marriage of sound to film. 

"Avatar"....Certainly deserved all three of its wins.  I did have one nagging question during the telecast: why did we not see clips associated with the nominees for cinematography?  That was a disturbing irony, to me, that we missed representative work from the most visual category.  I was a little surprised that "Avatar's"  huge popularity did not carry it to a Best Picture win.   I guess it peaked at the wrong time, or that the usual success-resentment backlash had set in during the voting period.  But then again, could many voters have seen this film only on a 2-dimensional screener CD?  The awe of its effects would certainly have been diminished in this format.

"The Hurt Locker"  This is a visceral character study that made voters feel noble.  To be fair, however, it is an excellent and effective little suspenser that was impossible to ignore.  While I was not a proponent of its rather cliched visual style, I admired its staging and capturing of movement and brilliant cutting.  In many ways it is as mysterious in its ascribing of motivation to its central character as was "Lawrence of Arabia".  It wisely sidestepped any political argument in favor of forcing the viewer to focus on the activities of Jeremy Renner's dangerously obsessed yet likeable character.  That is the key to my wanting to re-visit this intense world again soon.  This was a worthy choice for best Director and Picture.

I have already reviewed "The Blind Side" and "Crazy Heart" on these pages.  Neither one would have been my choice for Leading Actor/Actress accolades, even though both did very well with badly developed material.  I wonder if we will be talking about these performances next year with the same fervor and enthusiasm with which many of us remember....Slumdog Millionaire?

Ah well....  more about the movies as the year rolls on.....

IN APPRECIATION:

Great writing last week by Ben (Runs Like a Gay), Tom (Sophisticated Lunacy), Ultra Dave,  Bill Up Close, Russ (Blue Truck Red State),  Walter (The Silver Screening Room), Adam (The Oscar Completist), Andrew (Encore), Cathy (Cinema Style), Reality Zone, Charles (Do Something  Fun), and Steve (Holy Queer).